<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Presidential Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/</link>
	<description>Evan's rants - now available on the internet ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:24:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: evankeane</title>
		<link>http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>evankeane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>cool flip! that is a good explanation! i thought the last bit about parties penalising states and cutting delegate numbers was interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool flip! that is a good explanation! i thought the last bit about parties penalising states and cutting delegate numbers was interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fliptomato</title>
		<link>http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>fliptomato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>Ah! Found a nice explanation on the BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7049207.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah! Found a nice explanation on the BBC: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7049207.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7049207.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evankeane</title>
		<link>http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>evankeane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>thanks flip - you have given me some videos to watch! i still don&#039;t get the registering thing. even if it is optional. especially if it is used to allow you to partake in opinion polls! and they ring you to remind you to vote!!!! surely that is just wrong!! and i can imagine it is annoying as you say! i mean how can you not know there is an election - i assume (like everywhere else) the streets get plastered in campaign posters, the tv coverage is huge etc. i would be so mad if someone rang me to tell me to vote!!

when are the international brotherhood of physicists taking over world government anyway? soon i hope, but maybe after my PhD. I call vice president! no wait - junior vice president!

:)

Evan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks flip &#8211; you have given me some videos to watch! i still don&#8217;t get the registering thing. even if it is optional. especially if it is used to allow you to partake in opinion polls! and they ring you to remind you to vote!!!! surely that is just wrong!! and i can imagine it is annoying as you say! i mean how can you not know there is an election &#8211; i assume (like everywhere else) the streets get plastered in campaign posters, the tv coverage is huge etc. i would be so mad if someone rang me to tell me to vote!!</p>
<p>when are the international brotherhood of physicists taking over world government anyway? soon i hope, but maybe after my PhD. I call vice president! no wait &#8211; junior vice president!</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Evan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fliptomato</title>
		<link>http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>fliptomato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>Some thoughts... 

(1) Americans are into their election coverage. See Jon Stewart&#039;s `Indecision 2000 and Indecision 2004&#039; sketches on http://www.thedailyshow.com/ . When it comes to thinking carefully about our choices, we have a `kinda sucky&#039; track record. 

(2) I think the electoral college system is partially to blame for the low voter turn out, among other things. 

(3) Voters don&#039;t have to register with any party, they can register as independent or change every year. Part of the purpose of this is to determine who can caucus (if the party only allows party members to caucus). Another purpose appears to be to produce an opt-out calling list for party phone-bankers to remind people of their party to vote. (Very annoying.) 

(4) http://www.indecision2008.com/

(5) Unfortunately (in case you haven&#039;t noticed it), American elections are driven by large sums of money, and hence by the groups of people who have large sums of money. (6-ish years ago the McCain-Feingold campaign reform act was an important step in the right direction.) This relates to the end of point (1). 

(6) Also, the fact that the caucuses don&#039;t occur simultaneously is a bit awkward. Historically, candidates who have won Iowa (the first caucus) have an advantage for the others --- psychologically it shows that the candidate is the `real deal&#039; and is electable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some thoughts&#8230; </p>
<p>(1) Americans are into their election coverage. See Jon Stewart&#8217;s `Indecision 2000 and Indecision 2004&#8242; sketches on <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedailyshow.com/</a> . When it comes to thinking carefully about our choices, we have a `kinda sucky&#8217; track record. </p>
<p>(2) I think the electoral college system is partially to blame for the low voter turn out, among other things. </p>
<p>(3) Voters don&#8217;t have to register with any party, they can register as independent or change every year. Part of the purpose of this is to determine who can caucus (if the party only allows party members to caucus). Another purpose appears to be to produce an opt-out calling list for party phone-bankers to remind people of their party to vote. (Very annoying.) </p>
<p>(4) <a href="http://www.indecision2008.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.indecision2008.com/</a></p>
<p>(5) Unfortunately (in case you haven&#8217;t noticed it), American elections are driven by large sums of money, and hence by the groups of people who have large sums of money. (6-ish years ago the McCain-Feingold campaign reform act was an important step in the right direction.) This relates to the end of point (1). </p>
<p>(6) Also, the fact that the caucuses don&#8217;t occur simultaneously is a bit awkward. Historically, candidates who have won Iowa (the first caucus) have an advantage for the others &#8212; psychologically it shows that the candidate is the `real deal&#8217; and is electable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evankeane</title>
		<link>http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>evankeane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>The Simpsons always have it right!!!! I really do like that particular episode. Very funny indeed.

:)

Evan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Simpsons always have it right!!!! I really do like that particular episode. Very funny indeed.</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Evan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fliptomato</title>
		<link>http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>fliptomato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evankeane.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/american-presidential-election/#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>Kang [running for President]: Abortions for all! 
[crowd boos]
Very well, Abortions for none! 
[crowd boos]
Abortions for some, miniature American flags for the others! 
[crowd cheers]

And that&#039;s the essence of American politics. The Simpsons had it right the whole time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kang [running for President]: Abortions for all!<br />
[crowd boos]<br />
Very well, Abortions for none!<br />
[crowd boos]<br />
Abortions for some, miniature American flags for the others!<br />
[crowd cheers]</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the essence of American politics. The Simpsons had it right the whole time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
